The Implementation of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method to Determining the Superior Commodity of Tasikmalaya City

The Implementation of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method to Determining the Superior Commodity of Tasikmalaya City

• By Yani Sri Mulyani,1, a) Ai Ilah Warnilah,1, b) Ahmad Madkur,2, c) Hiqma Nur Agustina,3, d) Andini Linarsih,4, e) Herlan Sutisna,1, f) Fahmi,5, g) and Gusti Ayu Rai Made Suarniti6, h);
• Seminar Internasional
• 5

Despite the significant role of determining superior commodity in the regional economic development, studies addressing this issue in the handicraft products remain scarcely conducted. This study aimed to investigate the superior products
of handicraft commodities, including the creative industry of Tasikmalaya city, where the marketers go to foreign countr ies and
develop the tourism industry in the Tasikmalaya city. This study used the Simple Additive Weighting(SAW) method to determine
the superior commodity in Tasikmalaya city. The researcher had calculated three components to determine the superior commodity. They were capital investment values, production values, and employees. The result of this study revealed that embroidery
was a superior commodity in Tasikmalaya city. The data show that embroidery consistently grows every year, with 0.4 capital
investment values (K1) 0.3 production values (K2) and 0.3 employess (K3), which means that embroidery has experienced a very
good increase compared to other commodities. . Based on the results of data processing and analysis that had been done with
the Decision Support System with the SAW method, conclusions colud be drawn Embroidery commodity was a superior product
from Tasikmalaya which was in demand by buyers with a V value of 0.4 for Capital Investment Value,0.3 for Production Value and
Employees . All these findings confirm that the application of SAW method was meaningful to determine the superior commodity

• Katakunci Superior commodity, Embroidery , Simple Additive Weighting(SAW )method
• URL https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/2714/1/020023/2889702/The-implementation-of-the-Simple-Additive?redirectedFrom=fulltext
• Penerbit AIP Publishing,

REFERENSI

1. Alma Buchari, management of tourism industry. Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung, 2007.
2. S. Y. ; Pongi, M. Antara, Mahfudz;, and Rustam, “Superior Commodities Potential and the Strategy Development in Sigi District , Central
Sulawesi Province,” Int. J. Bus. Manag. Invent., vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 23–30, 2015.
3. M. U. Kurniawan, A. E. Cahyono, Sukidin, and S. Kantun, “Optimization of superior banana product diversification: Empowerment of poor
communities,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 243, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012089.
4. H. T. S. Sri Devi, “Decision Support Systems Assessment of the best village in Perbaungan sub-district with the Simple Additive Weighting
(SAW) Method,” J. Mantik, vol. 3, no. 3, [Online]. Available: https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/index .
5. M. M. 1 Elisabet Yunaeti Anggraeni 1 , Miftachul Huda 2, Andino Maseleno 1,3*, Jimaain Safar 2, Kamarul Azmi Jasmi 2, Ahmad Kilani
Mohamed 2, Aminudin Hehsan 2, Bushrah Basiron 2, Siti Suhaila Ihwani 2, Wan Hassan Wan Embong 2, Ahmad Marzuki Mohamad 2,
Sulaiman S, “Poverty level grouping using SAW method,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 227, pp. 218–224, 2018.
6. M. I. Hendri Mahmud Nawawi*1, Yudhistira Yudhistira2, Ali Mustopa3, Siti Khotimatul Wildah4, Sarifah Agustiani5, “Sistem Pendukung
Keputusan Pemilihan Tempat Usaha Potensial dengan Metode SAW (Studi Kasus : SahabatLink Tasikmalaya),” Indones. J. Softw. Eng., vol.
7, no. 1, pp. 26–34, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ijse.
7. R. L. L. Teuku Mufizar1, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kelayakan
Kredit Pinjaman Komersial Di SB Simpan Pinjam Tasikmalaya,” . CSRID J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 96–107.
8. S. Eniyati, “PerancanganSistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan untuk Penerimaan Beasiswa dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive
Weighting),” J. Teknol. Inf. Din., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171–176.
9. K. A. Henry Wibowo , Riska Amalia, Andi Fadlun, “Sistem pendukung keputusan untuk menentukan penerimaan beasiswa bank BRI menggunakan FMADM (studi kasus: mahasiswa fakultas tehnologi industry Universitas Islam Indonesia).,” journal.uii, vol. 1073, p. 998, [Online].
Available: http://journal.uii.ac.id/index.php/Snati/article/view/1073/998.
10. Kotler Philip, “Model Perilaku Konsumen,” 13th ed., Jakarta: Erlangga, 2009, p. 8.

11. Gunawan, A. E. Cahyono, and A. Santoso, “Local superior commodities, regional specializations and regional economic contributions,” J.
Distrib. Sci., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 35–41, 2018, doi: 10.15722/jds.16.9.201809.35.
12. A. Alhowaish, “Location Quotient Technique and Economy Analysis of Regions: Tabuk Province of Saudi Arabia as a Case Study,” Int. J. Sci.
Res., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1756–1761, 2015, doi: 10.21275/v4i12.nov152375.
13. S. Kusumadewi, “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM).,” in Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM).,
Yogjakarta: Graha Ilmu., 2006, p. 74.
14. and U. D. Trade, Cooperative, “Rekapitulasi Data Potensi Industri 2009-2019,” Tasikmalaya City, 2019.
15. Riyanto Bambang, Dasar-dasar pembelajaran perusahaan, 5th ed. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta : BPFE., 2016.
16. Lawrence J. Gitman, Principles Of Managerial Finance. Pearson Series In Finance, 2011.
17. Sumarsono and Sony, Ekonomi Manajemen SDM, ketenagakerjaan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu., 2003.
18. H. U. Matz, “Akuntansi Biaya Perencanaan dan Pengendalian,” in Akuntansi Biaya Perencanaan dan Pengendalian, Jakarta: Erlangga, 1990,p. 23.
19. M. Darwin, I. Bastian, and S. Sukamdi, “What Do Banks , Rural Credit Institutions , and Regulator s Infer from the Current Strengths and
Standing of Indonesian SMEs ?,” vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2020.
20. Competitive Strategy in Embroidery Industry in Tasikmalaya City,” vol. 6, no. 4 P. W. Tresna, “, pp. 514–527, 2017