Pengaruh Manajemen Pengetahuan terhadap Kinerja Organisasi yang Dimediasi oleh Modal Intelektual

research
  • 23 Aug
  • 2025

Pengaruh Manajemen Pengetahuan terhadap Kinerja Organisasi yang Dimediasi oleh Modal Intelektual

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh langsung dari manajemen pengetahuan terhadap kinerja organisasi dan pengaruh tidak langsungnya melalui modal intelektual sebagai mediator. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode kuantitatif melalui survey terhadap 430 responden yang berasal dari sektor publik di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan Analisis kuantitatif dengan bantuan SEM melalui program IBM AMOS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa manajemen pengetahuan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap modal intelektual, dengan kontribusi sebesar 23,1% terhadap penguatan modal manusia, struktural, dan relasional. Meskipun pengaruh langsung manajemen pengetahuan terhadap kinerja organisasi relatif kecil (R² = 4,3%), modal intelektual memiliki pengaruh yang lebih besar terhadap kinerja (R² = 22,6%). Lebih lanjut, pengaruh manajemen pengetahuan terhadap kinerja organisasi meningkat secara signifikan ketika dimediasi oleh modal intelektual, sehingga kombinasi kedua variabel mampu menjelaskan 65,6% variasi kinerjaorganisasi. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi manajemen pengetahuan dengan penguatan modal intelektual menjadi strategi penting dalam meningkatkan kinerja organisasi perangkat daerah.Secara praktis membantu manajer dan pengambil kebijakan khususnya di sektor publik untuk memahami peran dari manajemen pengetahuan, danmodal intelektual dalam meningkatkan kinerja organisasi.

Unduhan

 

REFERENSI

I. Popa, C. Dobrin, D. Popescu, and M. Draghici, “Competitive Advantage In The Public Sector,” Theor. Empir. Res. Urban Manag., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 60–66, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24873302

K. Dalkir, Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2011.

K. M. Wiig, “Knowledge Management in Public Administration,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 224–239, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210434331.

C.-J. Chen, T.-C. Liu, M.-A. Chu, and Y.-C. Hsiao, “Intellectual Capital and New Product Development,” J. Eng. Technol. Manag., vol. 33, no. July–September, pp. 154 –173, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.06.003.

R. Suzana and R. S. R. Kasim, “The Relationship of Knowledge Management Practices, Competencies and the Organizational Performance of Government Departments in Malaysia,” in 2010 International Conference on Education and Management Technology, 2010, pp. 531–535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMT.2010.5657598.

J. Darroch, “Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 101–115, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809.

E. Byukusenge and J. C. Munene, “Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter?,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1368434.

C.-L. Huang, “The Influence of Knowledge Management Implementation on Organizational Performance at Taiwan-listed Integrated Circuit Companies: Using Intellectual Capital as the Mediator,” J. Glob. Bus. Manag., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2011.

J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, Seventh Ed. Essex, England: Pearson New International Edition, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://elibrary.pearson.de/book/99.150005/9781292035116

J. Jyoti and A. Rani, “High Performance Work System and Organizational Performance: Role of Knowledge Managemen,” Pers. Rev., vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1770–1795, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2015-0262.

A. A. S. Seleim and O. E. M. Khalil, “Understanding The Knowledge Management-Intellectual Capital Relationship: A Two-Way Analysis,” J. Intellect. Cap., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 586–614, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111181742.

Z. Wang, N. Wang, and H. Liang, “Knowledge Sharing, Intellectual Capital, and Firm Performance,” Manag. Decis., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 230–258, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2013-0064.

C. T. De Angelis, “A Knowledge Management and Organizational Intelligence Model for Public Administration,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 807–819, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.791315.

I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001.

A. Farah and S. Abouzeid, “The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Performance: Evidence From The Public Sector,” Knowl. Manag. E-Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 225–238, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2017.09.013.

G. B. Kamath, “Intellectual Capital and Corporate Performance in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry,” J. Intellect. Cap., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 684–704, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810913221.

N. A. Torugsa and A. Arundel, “Complexity of Innovation in The Public Sector: A Workgroup-Level Analysis of Related Factors and Outcomes,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 392–416, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.984626.

A. Noruzy, V. M. Dalfard, B. Azhdari, S. Nazari-Shirkouhi, and A. Rezazadeh, “Relation Between Transformational Leadership, Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management, Organizational Innovation, and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Manufacturing Firms,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 64, no. February, pp. 1073–1085, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4038-y.

N. Bontis, “Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study That Develops Measures and Models,” Manag. Decis., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 63–76., 1998, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142.

Cari

Bidang Ilmu

Kategori

Kiriman Terbaru