Kebutuhan pengadaan barang atau jasa yang berkualitas suatu perusahaan ditentukan oleh supplier
yang baik. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, sebaiknya perusahaan melakukan pemilihan serta evaluasi terhadap supplier
yang telah bekerjasama berdasarkan kriteria yang telah ditentukan. Tujuannya agar supplier yang bekerjasama
bisa bersaing secara sehat dalam meningkatkan kualitas dan konsistensinya sebagai pemasok terhadap
perusahaan. proses penentuan rekomendasi supplier menggunakan metode Sistem pendukung keputusan
multikriteria yang bisa membatu dalam konsistensi kriteria serta keputusan yang diambil lebih akurat.
Pengolahan kriteria menggunakan metode AHP untuk melihat konsistensi bobot antara kriteria. Sedangkan
perbandingan metode MABAC dan WASPAS digunakan sebagai pembanding dengan data aktual untuk
mengetahui metode yang sesuai dengan studi kasus ini. Dari hasil penelitian perbandingan data aktual dengan
metode MABAC memiliki kesamaan hasil dari supplier yang direkomendasikan dibandingkan dengan metode
WASPAS.
Turnitin
Peer Review
Bid, S., & Siddique, G. (2019). Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. Heliyon, 5(6), e01956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01956
Božanić, D. I., Pamučar, D. S., & Karović, S. M. (2016). Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation. Tehnika, 71(1), 129– 136. https://doi.org/10.5937/tehnika1601129b
Bozanic, D., Pamucar, D., & Karovic, S. (2016). Use of the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up positions. Vojnotehnicki Glasnik, 64(3), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9261
Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharyya, O., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Application of WASPAS method as an optimization tool in non-traditional machining processes. Information Technology and Control, 44(1), 77–88.
https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.44.1.7124
Chakraborty, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Applications of WASPAS method as a multi-criteria decisionmaking tool. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 49(1), 1 –17.
Haldar, A., Banerjee, D., Ray, A., & Ghosh, S. (2012). An integrated approach for supplier selection. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2087– 2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.251
Muravev, D., & Mijic, N. (2020). A Novel Integrated Provider Selection Multicriteria Model: The BWM-MABAC Model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003078m
Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.31 7
Tundo, T., & Kurniawan, D. (2019). Implementation of the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment Method in Determining the Best Rice for Serabi Cake Making. IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), 8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.14421 /ijid.2019.08107
UmaDevi, K., Elango, C., & Rajesh, R. (2012). Vendor selection using AHP. Procedia Engineering, 38, 1946–1949.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.237
Wang, J., Wei, G., Wei, C., & Wei, Y. (2019). MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Defence Technology, 16(1), 1 –9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.019
Xue-Guo, X., Shi, H., Li-Jun, Z., & Hu-Chen, L. (2019). Green supplier evaluation and selection with an extended MABAC method under the heterogeneous information environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236616
Yusnaeni, W., Marlina, Hayuningtyas, R. Y., & Sari, R. (2021). Laporan Akhir-Comparison AHPMABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recomendations.