Comparison AHP-MABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recommendations

research
  • 07 Jun
  • 2022

Comparison AHP-MABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recommendations

Kebutuhan pengadaan barang atau jasa yang berkualitas suatu perusahaan ditentukan oleh supplier yang baik. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, sebaiknya perusahaan melakukan pemilihan serta evaluasi terhadap supplier yang telah bekerjasama berdasarkan kriteria yang telah ditentukan. Tujuannya agar supplier yang bekerjasama bisa bersaing secara sehat dalam meningkatkan kualitas dan konsistensinya sebagai pemasok terhadap perusahaan. proses penentuan rekomendasi supplier menggunakan metode Sistem pendukung keputusan multikriteria yang bisa membatu dalam konsistensi kriteria serta keputusan yang diambil lebih akurat. Pengolahan kriteria menggunakan metode AHP untuk melihat konsistensi bobot antara kriteria. Sedangkan perbandingan metode MABAC dan WASPAS digunakan sebagai pembanding dengan data aktual untuk mengetahui metode yang sesuai dengan studi kasus ini. Dari hasil penelitian perbandingan data aktual dengan metode MABAC memiliki kesamaan hasil dari supplier yang direkomendasikan dibandingkan dengan metode WASPAS.

Unduhan

 

REFERENSI

Bid, S., & Siddique, G. (2019). Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using

TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. Heliyon,

5(6), e01956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01956

Božanić, D. I., Pamučar, D. S., & Karović, S. M. (2016). Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation. Tehnika, 71(1), 129– 136. https://doi.org/10.5937/tehnika1601129b

Bozanic, D., Pamucar, D., & Karovic, S. (2016). Use of the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up positions. Vojnotehnicki Glasnik, 64(3), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9261

Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharyya, O., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Application of WASPAS method as an optimization tool in non-traditional machining processes. Information Technology and Control, 44(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.44.1.7124

Chakraborty, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Applications of WASPAS method as a multi-criteria decisionmaking tool. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 49(1), 1–17. Haldar, A., Banerjee, D., Ray, A., & Ghosh, S. (2012). An integrated approach for supplier selection. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2087– 2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.251

Muravev, D., & Mijic, N. (2020). A Novel Integrated Provider Selection Multicriteria

Model: The BWM-MABAC Model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003078m

Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024– 1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317

Tundo, T., & Kurniawan, D. (2019). Implementation of the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment Method in Determining the Best Rice for Serabi Cake Making. IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), 8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2019.08107

UmaDevi, K., Elango, C., & Rajesh, R. (2012). Vendor selection using AHP. ProcediaEngineering, 38, 1946–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.237

Wang, J., Wei, G., Wei, C., & Wei, Y. (2019). MABAC method for multiple attribute group

decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Defence Technology, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.019 Xue-Guo, X., Shi, H., Li-Jun, Z., & Hu-Chen, L. (2019). Green supplier evaluation and selection with an extended MABAC method under the heterogeneous informationenvironment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236616

Yusnaeni, W., Marlina, Hayuningtyas, R. Y., & Sari, R. (2021). Laporan Akhir-Comparison AHPMABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recomendations.

Cari

Bidang Ilmu

Kategori

Kiriman Terbaru