Patterns of Rhetorical Organization in The Jakarta Post Opinion Articles

research
  • 11 Apr
  • 2022

Patterns of Rhetorical Organization in The Jakarta Post Opinion Articles


Opinion articles are part of professional discourse genre that can be found in newspaper. These articles are separated from news pages and written by public, so they contain a variety of cultural background. By investigating the pattern of rhetorical organization in the opinion articles, this study aims to reveal the overall rhetorical patterns, the occurence of thesis statement, and to examine whether there is a difference in terms of the placement of thesis statement between native and non-native writers. This study investigated 151 opinion articles published in The Jakarta Post, March 2016 edition. Shi and Kubota’s (2007) four pattern of rhetorical organization was adapted as the theoretical framework for the present study. They results of this study showed that 47% of non-native writers and 38% of native writers put the thesis statement in the introduction part with single sentence paragraph or two short single-sentence paragraphs (pattern 1), and 38% of non-native writers and 40% of native writers write the introduction part with two or more multi sentence paragraphs, and put the thesis statement in the end of it. Only 8% of non-native writers and 5% of native writers put the thesis statement in the body part, while there were 7% of non-native writers and 17% of native writers wrote the thesis statement in the conclusion part. Generally, there was a slight difference between native and non-native writers in terms of the placement of thesis statement.


Unduhan

 

REFERENSI


References


Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2009). A cross-cultural analysis of English newspaper editorials: A systemic-functional view of text for contrastive rhetoric research. Regional Language Center Journal, 40(2), 211-249.


Bonyadi, A. (2010). The rhetorical properties of the schematic structures of newspaper editorials: A comparative study of English and Persian editorials. Discourse and Communication, 4(4), 323-342.


Bonnell, T. D. (1994). Independent Writing. USA: Heinle and Heinle.


Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Connor, U. (2002). New direction in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 493-510.


Dita, S. (2009). Physical and topical structure analysis of professional writing in inner, outer, and expanding circles of English. TESOL, 1,  95-118.


Davis, K. A. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 427-453.


Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Etalle, S. (2004). How to write an introduction: Some suggestions. Retrieved from http://www.win.tue.nl/`stalle/introduction.html.


Gunnarson, B., Linell, P., & Nordberg, B. (1997). The Construction of Professional Discourse. U.K: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.


Gehring, M. (2014). Developing Body Paragraphs. Retrieved from http://www.sjsu.edu/writingcentre.


Harklau, L. (2011). Approaches and methods in recent qualitative research: Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. New York: Routhledge.


Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspect of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford; Oxford University Press.


Kaplan, R.B. (1988). Contrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes towards a theory of contrastive rhetoric. In A.C. Purves (ed.), Writing Across Languages and Cultures (pp. 275-304). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.


Kaplan, R. B. (1972). The anatomy of rhetoric: Prolegomena to a functional theory of rhetoric. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.


Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16, 10-16.


Khodabandeh, F. (2007). A contrastive analysis of rhetorical figures in English and Persian advertisments. The Asian ESP Journal, 3(2), 41-64.


Kubota, R. (2010). Cross-cultural perspectives on writing: Contrastive rhetoric. Sociolinguistics and Language Education (pp. 265-289). Sidney: Multilingual Matters LTD.


Langan, J. (2013). Reading and study skills. (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.


Langan, J. (1992). Reading and Study Skills (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.


Liu, J.J. (2007). Placement of the Thesis Statement in English and Chinese Argumentative Essays: A Study of Contrastive Rhetoric. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 122-139.


Masroor, F. (2013). Argumentative strategies of newspaper editorials in English across cultures. Asian ESP Journal, 9(3), 35-72.


Milne, E. D. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 95-113.


Marin-Arrese, J. I. (2008). Commitment and subjectivity in the discourse of opinion columns and leading articles. Different Approaches to Opinion Discourse, 82-98.


Nunan, D. (1992). Research method in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Oshima, A. & Hoque, A. (1999). Writing Academic English. London: Longman.


Parodi, G. (2014). Genre organitation in specialized discourse: Disciplinary variation across university textbooks. Discourse Studies, 16(1). 65-87.


Petric, B. (2005). Contrastive rhetoric in the writing classroom: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 213-228.


Pulungan, A. H. & Subroto, E. D. (2010). Intertextuality in Indonesian newspaper opinion articles on education: Its types, functions, and discursive practice. TEFLIN, 21(2), 137-152.


Pulido, D. H. (2011). A systemic functional analysis of Philippine English newspaper editorials. TESOL, 4(1), 52-63.


Procter, M. (2016). Writing Support Over 50 other files giving advice on University writing. Retrieved from http://www.writing.utoronto.ca.


Rahayuni, N. K. S. (2015). Errors in writing a thesis statement made by students of English Department Udayana University. The 62nd TEFLIN International Conference: Teaching and Assessing L2 Learners in the 21st century, 2, 422-429.


Raygor, A. L. (1979). Reading for the main idea. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.


Rodriguez, M. J. G. (2008). On the interpretation of ideology through comment articles: Two views in opinion discourse. Different Approaches to Opinion Discourse, 49-68.


Shi, L., & Kubota, R. (2007). Patterns of rhetorical organization in Canadian and American languange arts textbooks: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 180-202.


Smirnova, A. V. (2009). Reported speech as an element of argumentative newspaper discourse. Discourse & Communication, 3(1), 79-103.


Smith, F. (2009) Writing and the writer. USA: Heinemann Publishing Company.


Swales, J. (1997). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Wang, W. (2008). Intertextual aspects of Chinese newspaper commentaries on the events of 9/11. Discourse Studies, 10(3), 361-381.

Yang, L. & Cahill, D. (2008). The rhetorical organization of Chinese and American students’ expository essays: A contrastive rhetoric study. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 113-132