The current study scrutinizes the representation of actors and goals of
transitivity system in the introduction sections of theses (ISoT)
composed by undergraduate students in reference to that of the
introduction sections of research articles (ISoRA) considered as the
target writings in the academic discourse of knowledge building. 738
English ranking clauses from 10 English-field ISoT and 694 from 10
ISoRA of TESOL Quarterly were analysed for their material processes
as well as their participants and circumstances. The analysis was
executed with the tables of analysis adapted from Halliday’s
experiential meaning framework. The analysis reveals that in the
material processes of ISoRA previous studies and previous
researchers instead of current studies and current researchers are
more frequently employed as actors. Contrary, in their ISoT
counterpart, the latter outnumbers the former. The analysis also finds
that goals in the material processes of ISoT in comparison with its
ISoRA counterpart still lack previous findings. Overall, the
representation of actors and goals in the material processes of ISoT
still needs lexical resources that underpin the process of knowledge
building. This has been confirmed by the tendency of actors and goals
of ISoT to represent its study undertaken, compared with its ISoRA
counterpart focusing more on previous related studies.
Artikel Penelitian Loquen
Hasil Peer Review Artikel Penelitian Loquen