Comparison AHP-MABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recommendations

research
  • 06 Aug
  • 2021

Comparison AHP-MABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recommendations

Abstract - The procurement of the goods or services of a company is determined by qualied suppliers. Therefore,
it is necessary for a company to choose and evaluate the suppliers that have cooperated based on the required
criteria. The purpose is that all of the suppliers can compete in improving the quality and their consistency as a
supplier to the company. The process to decide the appropriate supplier in this study is multicriteria support
decision methods that can help in the consistency's criteria and the accuracy of the decision. Here we perform
the calculation criteria for consistency with the AHP method that will further calculate the weight of criteria and
alternatives against the criteria using the method of MABAC and WASPAS. The results of the data comparison
using the method of MABAC have actual results with the suppliers recommended and not recommended
compared to the method of WASPAS.

Unduhan

 

REFERENSI

Bid, S., & Siddique, G. (2019). Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. Heliyon, 5(6), e01956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01956

Božanić, D. I., Pamučar, D. S., & Karović, S. M. (2016). Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation. Tehnika, 71(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.5937/tehnika1601129b

Bozanic, D., Pamucar, D., & Karovic, S. (2016). Use of the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up positions. Vojnotehnicki Glasnik, 64(3), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9261

Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharyya, O., Zavadskas, E.K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Application of WASPAS method as an optimization tool in non-traditional machining processes. Information Technology and Control, 44(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.44.1.7124

Chakraborty, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Applications of WASPAS method as a multi-criteria decisionmaking tool. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 49(1), 1 –17.

Haldar, A., Banerjee, D., Ray, A., & Ghosh, S. (2012). An integrated approach for supplier selection. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2087–2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.251

Muravev, D., & Mijic, N. (2020). A Novel Integrated Provider Selection Multicriteria Model: The BWM-MABAC Model. Decision
Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003078m

Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.31 7

Tundo, T., & Kurniawan, D. (2019). Implementation of the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment Method in Determining the Best Rice for Serabi Cake Making. IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), 8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.14421 /ijid.2019.08107

UmaDevi, K., Elango, C., & Rajesh, R. (2012).Vendor selection using AHP. Procedia Engineering, 38, 1946–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.237

Wang, J., Wei, G., Wei, C., & Wei, Y. (2019). MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Defence Technology, 16(1), 1 –9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.019

Xue-Guo, X., Shi, H., Li-Jun, Z., & Hu-Chen, L. (2019). Green supplier evaluation and selection with an extended MABAC method
under the heterogeneous information environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236616

Yusnaeni, W., Marlina, Hayuningtyas, R. Y., & Sari, R. (2021). Laporan Akhir-Comparison AHPMABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recomendations.

Cari

Bidang Ilmu

Kategori

Kiriman Terbaru