Position Based Job Promotion Using Multi-Criteria Elimination VIKOR Method

Position Based Job Promotion Using Multi-Criteria Elimination VIKOR Method

• By Akmaludin,; Mulyani, Astriana; Santoso, Budi; Widianto, Kudiantoro;
• Jurnal Internasional Bereputasi
• 392
• 1-7

Job promotion is the best action of a company to improve the progress of the company itself, thus it must be done objectively and responsibly respectfully. There are a number of benchmarks for carrying out the promotion process which as a whole can be recognized as an honorable action for someone selected through this promotion process, in this study called criteria, the benchmark consists of seven criteria that can represent strength that can be recognized based on company provisions. This rule has two understandings that are interpreted differently and are quite difficult for mathematical calculation processes. For criteria that are meaningful and related to time have the meaning that the weight of the smallest value is the best, or different meanings that bear the weight of the greatest value are the best. For this promotion process, a combination of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and the VIKOR index elimination system is used, both of which have far different functions, namely AHP is intended to determine the preference weighting scale while VIKOR is intended to determine the ranking of each alternative over the alternative. The decision on the outcome of the best promotion is the fifth employee (K5) with a score index of 0.00 and followed sequentially (K2), (K3), (K1), (K4) sequentially with a score index of 0.62; 0.66; 0.75 and 0.93. This result is used as a benchmark for the best decisions.

• Katakunci
• URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012013
• Penerbit ,

REFERENSI

[1] B. Prabowo, “Motivasi Kerja dan Prestasi Kerja ( Studi Pada Karyawan PT Telkom Indonesia Witel Jatim Selatan Malang ),” J. Adm. Bisnis, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 106–113, 2016.

[2] I. Eva Solita Pasaribu, “Sitem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan Karyawan Dengan Metode Analytycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) Studi Kasus Pada PT.Selular Global Net Medan,” Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., pp. 71–78, 2015.

[3] B. S. Riza and J. Irianti, “Sistem Promosi Jabatan Dengan Menggunakan Analytic Network Process ( Studi Kasus di PT . Maxi Media ),” Konf. Nas. Sist. Inform., pp. 789–794, 2015.

[4] M. F. El-santawy, “A VIKOR Method for Solving Personnel Training,” Int. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 9–12, 2012.

[5] T. Bakshi, A. Sinharay, B. Sarkar, and S. Sanyal, “MCDM Based Project Selection by F-AHP & VIKOR,” no. 1, pp. 381–2011, 2016.

[6] E. D. Coulter, J. Coakley, and J. Sessions, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Tutorial for Use in Prioritizing Forest Road Investments to Minimize Environmental Effects,” Int. J. For. Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 51–69, 2006.

[7] Q. Yin, “An Analytical Hierarchy Process Model For The Evaluation Of College,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 59–65, 2013.

[8] Mardani A, E. K. Zavadskas, and K. Govindan, “VIKOR Technique : A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on sustainability VIKOR Technique : A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications,” no. January, pp. 2–38, 2016.

[9] H. Jati and a Webometrics, “Comparison of University Webometrics Ranking Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis : TOPSIS and VIKOR Method,” Word J. Int. Linguist. Assoc., pp. 1663–1669, 2012.

[10] Z. Zhang and C. Guo, “A VIKOR-Based Approach to Group Decision Making With Uncertain Preference Ordinals and Incomplete Weight Information,” Informatica, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 689–708, 2016.

[11] C. T. Sasanka and K. Ravindra, “Implementation of VIKOR Method for Selection of Magnesium Alloy to Suit Automotive Applications,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 83, pp. 49–58, 2015

[12] A. Basriani and Martina, “Pengaruh Promosi Jabatan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Tasma Puja Di Pekanbaru,” Menara Ilmu, vol. XI, no. 76, pp. 15–28, 2017.

[13] Saefudin and W. Sri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada RSUD Serang,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–37, 2013.

[14] C. A. Poveda, “Weighting Sustainable Development Indicators ( SDIs ) for Surface Mining Operations Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) ( SDIs ) FOR SURFACE MINING OPERATIONS USING THE,” no. January 2014, pp. 199–222, 2015.

[15] J. M. Fernandes, S. P. Rodrigues, and L. A. Costa, “Comparing AHP and ELECTRE i for prioritizing software requirements,” IEEE, 2015.

[16] Akmaludin, “Multicriteria Analysis Menentukan Point Weight Comparison Dalam Penetapan Decision Priority,” J. Pilar Nusa Mandiri, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2015.

[17] A. Ishizaka and A. Labib, “Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process,”Pre Print Vertion, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 14336–14345, 2011.

[18] Saaty TL, “How to Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Interfaces (Providence)., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 19–43, 2014.

[19] K. G. D. Prasad, M. V Prasad, R. S. Kumar, V. S. D. Prasad, and K. V. S. J. Shanmukhi, “Kanobased VIKOR Decision model for Supplier Selection – A Case Study,” no. October, 2017.

[20] C. Srisawat and J. Payakpate, “Comparison of MCDM methods for intercrop selection in rubber plantations,” no. June, 2016.

[21] K. Renganath, “Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy MCDM Techniques : A Literature Review,” 2016.

[22] L. Markovic, M. Cvetkovic, and L. Milic-Markovic, “Multi-criteria decision-making when choosing variant solution of highway route at the level of preliminary design,” Facta Univ. - Ser. Archit. Civ. Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 2013.

[23] Y. O. Yang, J. Leu, and G. Tzeng, “A vikor-based multiple criteria decision method for improving information security risk,” no. May 2014, 2009.

[24] K. Dashore, S. Singh Pawar, N. Sohani, and D. S. Verma, “Product Evaluation Using Entropy and Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol., vol. 4, no. May, pp. 2183–2187, 2013.

[25] S. K. Jarial and R. K. Garg, “MCDM-Matrix Method-a Case Study for Commercial Vehicles in an Automobile Industry,” MNK Publ., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 337–341, 2012.

[26] A. Sciences, “Investment Destination Decision by Using the VIKOR Method in the European,” Am. Int. J. Contemp. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 16–24, 2016.

[27] A. Mardani, E. K. Zavadskas, K. Govindan, A. A. Senin, and A. Jusoh, “VIKOR technique: A systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications,” Sustain., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 2016.