Comparison of Data Mining Algorithms Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Naive Bayes for Preterm Birth Prediction

Comparison of Data Mining Algorithms Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Naive Bayes for Preterm Birth Prediction

• By Puspitasari, Diah; Ramanda, Kresna; Supriyatna, Adi; Wahyudi, Mochamad; Sikumbang, Erma Delima; Sukmana, Sulaeman Hadi;
• Seminar Internasional Bereputasi
• 379
• 1-6

Premature birth is still a big problem in Indonesia, in general, 15 million babies are born prematurely every year, more than 1 million babies die from complications due to premature birth.The main purpose of this study is to compare the Artificial Neural Network and Naive Bayes datamining algorithm models to predict preterm birth so as to obtain clinical evidence in preterm birth long before confinement so that sudden preterm birth can be converted to normal nativity. The model proposed in research on the prediction of preterm birth is by applying an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm and Naive Bayes algorithm. Where the two algorithms will be compared the level of accuracy and the value of the AUC against the prediction of preterm birth The results obtained that the prediction of preterm birth using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm produces an accuracy value of 90.67% and an ROC value of 0.954. While the Naive Bayes algorithm produces an accuracy value of 84.53% and an ROC value of 0.929. For this reason, it can be concluded that the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm has a superior accuracy of 6.14% and 0.025 for its ROC value in predicting preterm birth.

• Katakunci
• URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1641/1/012068
• Penerbit ,

REFERENSI

[1] Carolina I and Kresna R, 2018 Klasifikasi kelahiran prematur menggunakan algoritma c4.5 p. 668–672. [2] Esty A Frize M Gilchrist J and Bariciak E, 2018 Applying Data Preprocessing Methods to Predict Premature Birth in 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2018 p. 6096–6099. [3] Kocak A T and Yilmaz A, 2018 Segmentation and classification of contractions in uterine 16 channels EMG signals for preterm birth prediction in 2018 26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) p. 1–4. [4] Goldenberg R L Culhane J F Iams J D and Romero R, Jan. 2008 Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth Lancet 371, 9606 p. 75–84. [5] Raghav H K V S Devi S P Rengaraj N and Thanranikumar E, 2018 Prediction of Preterm Pregnancies using Soft Computing Techniques Neural Networks and Gradient Descent Optimizer 2018 Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Informatics March 2016 p. 1–4. [6] Janjarasjitt S, 2017 Evaluation of performance on preterm birth classification using single wavelet-based features of EHG signals in 2017 10th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON) 2017–Janua p. 1–4. [7] Gorunescu F, 2011 Data Mining Concepts , Models and Te chniques Springer. [8] Catley C Frize M Walker R C and Petriu D C, Jul. 2006 Predicting High-Risk Preterm Birth Using Artificial Neural Networks IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 10, 3 p. 540–549. [9] Septiani W D, 2017 Komparasi Metode Klasifikasi Data Mining Algoritma C4.5 Dan Naive Bayes Untuk Prediksi Penyakit Hepatitis J. Pilar Nusa Mandiri 13, 1 p. 76–84. [10] Pari R Sandhya M and Sankar S, 2017 Risk factors based classification for accurate prediction of the Preterm Birth in 2017 International Conference on Inventive Computing and Informatics (ICICI) Icici p. 394–399. [11] Puspita A and Wahyudi M, 2015 Algoritma C4.5 Berbasis Decision Tree untuk Prediksi Kelahiran Bayi Prematur Konf. Nasinal Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. 1, 1 p. 97–102. [12] Idowu I O Fergus P Hussain A Dobbins C and Askar H Al, 2014 Advance Artificial Neural Network Classification Techniques Using EHG for Detecting Preterm Births in 2014 Eighth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems p. 95–100. [13] Ren J Lee S D Chen X Kao B Cheng R and Cheung D, 2009 Naive Bayes Classification of Uncertain Data in 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining 60703110 p. 944–949.