Pengaruh Etos Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Pos Indonesia Cabang Pemuda Jakarta Timur

research
  • 04 Jun
  • 2020

Pengaruh Etos Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Pos Indonesia Cabang Pemuda Jakarta Timur

This research aims to determine the effect: work ethic on employee performance at PT Pos Indonesia Branch Pemuda East Jakarta. This research method is associative causal with a quantitative approach. The samples taken for this study were 33 people. Data was collected by questionnaires that had been tested for validity and  reliability.  Regression  test  correlation  coefficient  test  and  coefficient  of  determination  test  with  SPSS version 24.0 application program. The results of the regression equation: Y = 12.292 + 0.711 X. Where Y = Employee Performance, and X = Work Ethic, which can be summarized as follows. The constant of 12.292 states that if there is no work ethic carried out by the company, then the employee's performance is 12.292. The X regression coefficient of 71.1% states that every increase in 1 unit of work ethic will increase employee performance by 71.1%. And vice versa, So the direction of the work ethic relationship with performance is positive, meaning in the same direction. R Square of 0.778 or 77.8%, meaning that employee performance is influenced  by  work  ethic  of  77.8%  while  the  remaining  22.2%  is  explained  by  other  variables  such  as leadership style, discipline, compensation, training, organizational culture.


Unduhan

 

REFERENSI

A.Tabrani  Rusyan,  dkk.  1989.  Pendekatan  dalam Proses  Belajar  Mengajar. Bandung:  Remaja Karya.

 

Anoraga, Panji. 2001. Psikologi Kerja. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

 

Bangun, Wilson. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga.


Boatwright, J. R. & Slate, J. R. (2000). Work Ethic Measurement of Vocational Students in. Georgia. Journal of Vocational Education Research [On-line], vol.25.

 

Darodjat,  Tubagus  Achmad. 2015.  Konsep-Konsep  Dasar  Manajemen  Personalia-. Masa  Kini. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

 

Darwish,  A.  Yousef.1997.  Organizational  Comitment:  A  Mediator  of  the  relationships  of leadership behavior with job satisfaction and Performance in a non- Western Country. Journal of managerial psychology. Vol 15 No 1 2000

 

Dessler, Gary. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Edisi kesepuluh jilid 1). Jakarta: PT.Indeks.

 

Dharma, Surya. 2005. Manajemen Kinerja Falsafah. Teori dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

 

Handoko, T Hani. 1999. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

 

Hardjosoedarmo, Soewarso. (1999). Total Quality Management. Yogyakarta.

 

Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.

 

Hasibuan, SP Malayu.2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

 

              . 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

 

Irawan, Prasetya, 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: STIALAN Press.

 

Istijanto.(2006). Riset Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

 

Ivancevich M,John dkk ,2007, Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi, Jilid 1,Edisi Ketujuh, Jakarta: Erlangga.

 

Kusnan, A., & Airlangga, U. 2004. Analisis Sikap Iklim Organisasi, Etos Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja dalam Menentukan Efektivitas Kinerja Organisasi di GarnisunTetap III.  Jurnal Ilmiah. Bisnis dan Ekonomi ASIA Vol, 4(2). Surabaya. Malang.

 

Mangkunegara.  Anwar  Prabu,  2014.  Sumber  Daya  Manusia  Perusahaan,  Bandung:  Remaja R