This research aims to determine the effect: work ethic on employee performance at PT Pos Indonesia Branch Pemuda East Jakarta. This research method is associative causal with a quantitative approach. The samples taken for this study were 33 people. Data was collected by questionnaires that had been tested for validity and reliability. Regression test correlation coefficient test and coefficient of determination test with SPSS version 24.0 application program. The results of the regression equation: Y = 12.292 + 0.711 X. Where Y = Employee Performance, and X = Work Ethic, which can be summarized as follows. The constant of 12.292 states that if there is no work ethic carried out by the company, then the employee's performance is 12.292. The X regression coefficient of 71.1% states that every increase in 1 unit of work ethic will increase employee performance by 71.1%. And vice versa, So the direction of the work ethic relationship with performance is positive, meaning in the same direction. R Square of 0.778 or 77.8%, meaning that employee performance is influenced by work ethic of 77.8% while the remaining 22.2% is explained by other variables such as leadership style, discipline, compensation, training, organizational culture.
LEMBAR HASIL PENILAIAN SEJAWAT Jurnal Managerial Vol.2. No.1, Februari 2019
Pengaruh Etos Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan
A.Tabrani Rusyan, dkk. 1989. Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Karya.
Anoraga, Panji. 2001. Psikologi Kerja. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bangun, Wilson. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Boatwright, J. R. & Slate, J. R. (2000). Work Ethic Measurement of Vocational Students in. Georgia. Journal of Vocational Education Research [On-line], vol.25.
Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad. 2015. Konsep-Konsep Dasar Manajemen Personalia-. Masa Kini. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Darwish, A. Yousef.1997. Organizational Comitment: A Mediator of the relationships of leadership behavior with job satisfaction and Performance in a non- Western Country. Journal of managerial psychology. Vol 15 No 1 2000
Dessler, Gary. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Edisi kesepuluh jilid 1). Jakarta: PT.Indeks.
Dharma, Surya. 2005. Manajemen Kinerja Falsafah. Teori dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Handoko, T Hani. 1999. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Hardjosoedarmo, Soewarso. (1999). Total Quality Management. Yogyakarta.
Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Hasibuan, SP Malayu.2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Irawan, Prasetya, 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: STIALAN Press.
Istijanto.(2006). Riset Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ivancevich M,John dkk ,2007, Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi, Jilid 1,Edisi Ketujuh, Jakarta: Erlangga.
Kusnan, A., & Airlangga, U. 2004. Analisis Sikap Iklim Organisasi, Etos Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja dalam Menentukan Efektivitas Kinerja Organisasi di GarnisunTetap III. Jurnal Ilmiah. Bisnis dan Ekonomi ASIA Vol, 4(2). Surabaya. Malang.
Mangkunegara. Anwar Prabu, 2014. Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Bandung: Remaja R