Pengaruh Komunikasi Organisasi Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Pegawai Pada Pt. Sejahtera Buana Trada Jakarta

Pengaruh Komunikasi Organisasi Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Pegawai Pada Pt. Sejahtera Buana Trada Jakarta

• By Suwandi, Muhammad Muhammad Muhammad;
• Jurnal Nasional Tidak Terakreditasi
• 365
• 31-40

Abstract

This research aims to determine the influence of organizational communication on work motivation of employees at PT. Sejahtera Buana Trada Jakarta. The research method used in the quantitative method is assisted by the SPSS series 24.0 application program. The sample used was 35 respondents, in this study also tested the validity, reliability, correlation coefficient, coefficient of determination, and linear regression analysis. Based on a simple linear regression analysis between the independent variables of organizational communication (X), on employee motivation (Y), the equation can be arranged as follows: Y = 5.319 + 0.838X, 838, so that it can be stated that if there is no organizational communication carried out by PT . Sejahtera Buana Trada, work motivation is only 5.319. The regression coefficient of X is 0.838 stating that for each addition of 1 (one) time to organizational communication, work motivation will increase by 5.319. Conversely the direction of organizational communication relations and work motivation is positive means that it is in the same direction. Correlation coefficient of influence of Organizational Communication on work motivation (R) 0.849, and determination coefficient (R2) of 0.80 where the remaining 20% ​​is influenced by other factors such as; leadership style, compensation and others.

• Katakunci
• URL http://journal.stie-kusumanegara.ac.id/index.php/managerial/article/view/78
• Penerbit Jurnal Managerial - CMED STIE Kusuma Negara, Jakarta Timur DKI Jakarta

REFERENSI

Abizar. 1988. Komunikasi Organisasi. Jakarta: Ditjen Dikti Depdikbud Agus Eko Sujianto. 2009. Aplikasi Statistik dengan SPSS 16.0. Jakarta: PT. Prestasi Pustaka Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, dan Tinton Rumbungan Octorend, (2015). Effect of Work Discipline, Work Motivation and Job Satisfaction on Employee Organizational Commitment in the Company (Case Study in PT. Dada Indonesia).Universal Journal of Management. Vol.3. No.8: 318- 328. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung. Arep, Ishak dan Hendri Tanjung. (2004). Manajemen Motivasi. Jakarta. PT. Grasindo. Bittel, L., Newstrom, J. W., Newstrom, J., 1994, What Every Supervisor Should Know: The Complete Guide to Supervisory Management, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Buchhari. Zainun, (1990). Manajemen dan Motivasi. Jakarta: Balai Aksara. Bungin, Burhan. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Prenadamedia. Davis, K&Newstroom. J.W. (1982). Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior. Seventh Edition Singapore: McGraw Hill Book Company Inc. Effendy, Onong Uchjana.2009.Human relations dan public relations. Mandar Maju. Bandung. Fajar M. 2009. Ilmu Komunikasi Teori Dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Graham Ilmu George, J. M. & Jones, G. R., 2005, Essentials of Managing Organizational Behavior, 4th ed., New Jersey: Upper Saddle River. Handoko, T. Hani. 2003. Manajemen. Cetakan Kesembilanbelas. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Koontz, Harold. & Weichrich, Heinz. (2010). Essential Of Management: An International Perspective, New Delhi: Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A. (2007). Organizational Behavior. (7th ed). New York: Mc Graw Hill.  Luthans, F., 1995, Organizational Behavior, 7th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Manullang, Marihot, 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Yogyakarta Mathis, L. Robert. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Salemba Empat Patria. McClelland, D.C. 1987. Human Motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Morgan, C.T. (1986). Introduction to Psychology. Seventh edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill. Motivasi adalah suatu kecenderungan untuk beraktifitas, dimulai dari dorongan dalam diri (drive) dan diakhiri dengan penyesuaian diri, penyesuaian diri dikatakan untuk memuaskan motif (Mangkunegara, 2015:93). Pace, R Wayne. & Faules, Don. (2006). Komunikasi Organisasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Rivai, Veithzal. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan dari Teori ke Praktik.PT Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta Riyadi, Slamet. 2011. Pengaruh Kompensasi Finansial, Gaya Kepemimpinan, dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan Vol.13 No.1 Maret 2011.diakses tanggal 23 April 2018 Robbins, P. Stephen. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Kesepuluh. Jakarta: PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia Robbins, Stephen P, 1998. Perilaku Organisasi, PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta. Robbins, Stephen P. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi 12. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Santoso, Singgih. 2017. Menguasai Statistik dengan SPSS 24.0. Penerbit: Elex Media Komputido. Jakarta Sendjaja.S Djuarsa. 1994. Teori Komunikasi. Universitas Terbuka. Jakarta. Siagian, Sondang, 1983, Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Adminsitrasi, Jakarta: PT. Gunung Agung. Siregar, Syofian. 2013. Statistik Parametrik untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta. PT. Bumi Aksara Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif R&B. Bandung: Aflabeta. Tata McGraw Hill. Thoha, Miftah, 2001, Perilaku Organisasi, Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. Wayne, R. Pace dan Don F. Faules. (2006). Komunikasi organisasi, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung. Werner, John. M. & DeSimone, Randy. L. 2006. Human Resource Development. United States of America: Thomson.  Wexley, Kenneth N., Yukl, Gary A. 1992. Organizational Behavior and Personel Psychology. USA: Richard D. Irwin Inc.  Wood, et.al. 2001. Organizational Behavior: A Global Perspective. USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.