Related to online transactions is increasing causing various new technologies in the financial sector, one of which is e-wallet. There are 38 recorded e-wallets in Indonesia that have been licensed by Bank Indonesia, one of which is OVO. Competition between e-wallets causes OVO which is also the second most popular e-wallet in Indonesia, to continue to make various innovations to increase the use of OVO. In addition, OVO e-wallet is also being introduced to introduce the public through various promotions. This study discusses the great benefits, benefits of using and promoting both partial and simultaneous decisions on the use of OVO e-wallet by the people in Depok. The research method used in this research is descriptive quantitative research method. The number of respondents taken was 100 people using convenience sampling method. Data recovery uses multiple linear analysis with the help of SPSS 21 application. This study produces positive and significant conclusions both partially and simultaneously between the benefits, utilization and ease of use and promotion of the use of the OVO e-wallet application..
Jurnal Pengaruh Kemanfaatan, Kemudahan Penggunaan dan Promosi terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan E-wallet OVO di Depok
Daftar isi + redaktur
Ardyanto, D., Susilo, H., & Riyadi. (2015). Pengaruh Kemudahan dan Kepercayaan Menggunakan E-Cmmerce terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Oonline ( Survei Pada Konsumen www.petersaysdenim.com ). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 22(1), 1–8.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, n, 319–340. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/249008
Devita, V. D. (2019). Siapa Aplikasi E-wallet dengan Pengguna Terbanyak di Indonesia? Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://iprice.co.id/trend/insights/e-walletterbaik-di-indonesia/
Heryanto, I. (2015). Analisis pengaruh produk, harga, distribusi, dan promosi terhadap keputusan pembelian serta implikasinya pada kepuasan pelanggan. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 80–101.
Jayani, D. H. (2019). Transaksi Uang Elektronik Melonjak 209,8% pada 2018. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/20 19/09/23/transaksi-uang-elektronik-melonjak2098-pada-2018
Jogiyanto, H. M. (2007). Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan (Revisi). Yyogyakarta: Andi.
Kotler, P., & Amstrong, G. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran Edisi Ketujuh (7th ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Laksana, G. B., Astuti, E. S., & Dewantara, R. Y. (2015). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemanfaatan, Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Persepsi Resiko dan Persepsi Kesesuaian terhadap Minat Menggunakan Mobile Banking (Studi Pada Nasabah Bank Rakyat Indonesia ( BRI ) Kantor Cabang Rembang , Jawa Tengah ). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 26(2), 1–8.
Nurhayata, S. (2017). Pengaruh Citra Merek, Harga dan Promosi terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Handphone Samsung di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, IV(2), 60–69.
Pratiwi, A. (2017). Analisis Faktor yang Mpengaruhi Keputusan Konsumen dalam Memilih Grab Car di Surabaya. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia.
Priyatno, D. (2012). Belajar Cepat Olah Data Statistik dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Sekaran, U. (2011). Research Methods For Business (Metode Penelitian Untuk. Bisnis). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Silalahi, U. (2015). Metode Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Bandung. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabetha.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susilo, W. T., Ariyanti, M., & Sumrahadi. (2017). Pengaruh Daya Tarik Promosi, Persepsi Kemudahan, Persepsi Kemanfaatan dan Harga terhadap Minat Beli E-TOLL CARD BANK MANDIRI. E-Proceeding of Management Telkom Univerysty, 4(1), 25–31.
Usman, R. (2017). Karakteristik uang elektronik dalam sistem pembayaran. Yuridika, 32(1), 134–166.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). U SER A CCEPTANCE OF I NFORMATION T ECHNOLOGY : T OWARD A U NIFIED V IEW 1. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.