PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU DENGAN MODEL FUZZY MULTI ATRIBUTE DECISION MAKING SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTED PADA SMA UNITY SCHOOL

PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU DENGAN MODEL FUZZY MULTI ATRIBUTE DECISION MAKING SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTED PADA SMA UNITY SCHOOL

• By Juando, Raden Rivan , Adiwiharja, Cep; Malau, Yesni;
• Jurnal Nasional Tidak Terakreditasi
• 335
• 13-22

This article content about the implementation about work  examination of teachers performance at Unity School High School The process   of   examination     will determine the extension of the teaching contract and as a reference for increasing teacher’s salaries. The number of subject teachers and the skills of each teacher are varies making decision to appraise the performance of Teachers  at  Unity  School  High  School  are  still  confused.  This  time  the  work  examination  of teacher’s performance at Unity School High School appraisal is only the attendance of teacher teaching and personal assessment from the Director of Education during interviews.  Unity School High School needed of decision support system for work examination of teachers performance,  a decision support system that can determine the calculation values for all criteria.  Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is a method that looks for weighted sums, there are eight criteria use are student understanding, behavior, initiative, integrity, collaboration, discipline, mastery of teaching material, and delivery of material to students. In this case the teacher's performance assessment is done by summing the weights of the values in each alternative for all attributes. Larger values will indicate that the alternative is selected.

• Katakunci Guru, SAW, SPK
• URL https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JUSS/article/view/5916
• Penerbit ,

REFERENSI

.  Undang   –   Undang   Republik   Indonesia

Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional dan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun  2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Visi Mediapustaka.

2. Nofriansyah, Dicky. 2014. Konsep Data Mining VS Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

3.  Alfianika  Ninit.  2016.  Metode  Penelitian

Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

4.  Elcome.    2010.    Belajar    Kilat    SPSS.

Yogyakarta. Andi.

5.  Rijayana, Iwan, dan Lirien Okiridho. 2012.

Sistem  Pendukung  Keputusan  Pemilihan

Karyawan Berprestasi Berdasarkan Kinerja Menggunakan Metode Analityc Hierarcy Proces. Yogyakarta: Jurnal Informatika. ISSN:19782328

6.  Sudibyo,   Lies,   Bambang   Triyanto   dan

Meidawati Suswandari. 2014. Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

7.  Triwahyuni,   Atin,   M.   Reza   Septiawan, Rizal dan Marsusilianti. 2015. Sistem Pendukung         Keputusan         Penentuan

Karyawan Terbaik Carrefour Menggunakan

Metode Simple Additive Wighting (SAW). Palembang:          Jurnal          Informatika.

Vol.15,No.1:66-80.

8.  Yuliani,  I  Dewa  Ayu  Eka.  2012.  Sistem

Pendukung  Keputusan  Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Proces. Pontianak: Jurnal Sisfotenika. Vol.3 No 2:105-114.