This research aims to
determine the effect of product quality on Samsung smartphone purchase
decisions. Assisted with SPSS application program veesi 24.0. A random sample
count of 100 people. Technique of collecting data using questionnaire xenan
likert scale. Correlation Coefficient Test Results on Samsung smartphone of
0.713 which has a strong influence between the independent variable (Product
Quality) with the dependent variable (Purchase Decision). Based on the table
Anova can be seen that the significant value of 0.000 <0.005 then the
decision H1 accepted.Based on Summary Model table above can be known R Square
value of 0.508 or 50.8%, meaning that the purchase decision variable is influenced
by product quality variable of 50.8% . While the rest of 49.2% influenced
influenced by other factors. From result of regression analysis can be obtained
equation that is: Y = 16,121 + 0,602, X Where Y = purchase decision and X =
product quality. Then it can be concluded the constant of 16,121 states that if
there is no quality of Products done by the company, then the purchase decision
obtained sebesaar 16.121. The regression coefficient X of 0.602 states that
every addition of 1 times the quality of the product can increase the purchase
decision of 0.602. And conversely, if product quality decreased 1 (one) time
then Purchase Decision predicted decrease equal to 0,602. So the direction of
the relationship The quality of the product with the purchase decision is
positive meaning unidirectional. From the calculation results of regression
equation test above about the effect of product quality on Samsung smartphone
purchase decision positive relationship or direction between the influence of
product quality influence to purchase decision.
Lembar Hasil peer review
Alma.Buchari, 2004. Manajemen Pemasaran dan Pemasaran Jasa. Penerbit: Alfabeta. Bandung Assael, H.2010. Consumer Behavior in Marketing Action. Prantice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey
Assauri,
Sofjan. 2001. Manajemen Produksi dan Operasi. Edisi Revisi. Penerbit Fakultas
Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Husain,Umar
1997. Metodelogi Penelitian (Aplikasi dalam Pemasaran) Penerbit: Gramedia
Pustaka Utama. Jakarta
Juwandi,Hendy Irawan. 2004. Kepuasan Pelayanan Jasa. Penerbit; Erlangga. Jakarta.
Kotler, Philip & Armstrong, Gary. 2012. Prinsipprinsip Pemasaran.
Edisi 13. Jilid 1. Penerbit; Erlangga. Jakarta
Kotler, Philip dan Kevin Lane Keller. 2009. Manajemen Pemasaran Edisi ke Tigabelas Jilid 1.Penerbit; Erlangga, Jakarta.
2009. Manajemen Pemasaran Edisi ke Tigabelas Jilid 2. Penerbit; Erlangga, Jakarta. Kotler, Philip, 2003. Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi Kesebelas. Penerbit; Indeks Kelompok Gramedia. Jakarta
Kotler,
Philip.2005. Manajemen Pemasaran. Alih Bahasa: Juhardi. Edisi 11. Jilid 1.
Penerbit: PT. Prehalindo. Jakarta
Sekaran,
Uma. 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Bisnis. Jilid 1. Edisi 4. Penerbit;
Salemba Empat. Jakarta
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode PenelitianKuantitatif Kualitatif
dan R&D. Penerbit: Alfabeta. Bandung
2008. Metode Penelitian Kunatitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Penerbit; Alfabeta. Bandung
2001. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung
Swasta,
Basu Dharmmesta. 2010. Manajemen Pemasaran, analisa perilaku konsumen. Edisi
pertama. Cetakan ketiga. Penerbit: BPFE. Yogyakarta
Swastha, Basu Dharmmesta & Hani Handoko. 2012. Manajemen Pemasaran: Analisa Perilaku Konsumen. Edisi 1. Penerbit: BPFE. Yogyakata
2011. Manajemen Pemasaran Analisis Perilaku Konsumen. Edisi ke Enam.
Penerbit; BPFE. Yogyakarta
Tjiptono,
Fandy, Gregorius dan Dadi Adriana. 2008. Pemasaran Strategik. Penerbit; ANDI.
Yogyakarta