The long-term prospect of the company's progress is determined by the quality of human resources (HR), The urgency to maintain the company's survival it takes a reliable and futuristic leader. Measuring tool that can be used is none other than the performance of human resources. Of course with potential leaders will provide the vision of the company's mission to grow and expand. Leadership selection process can be done with promotion positions based on performance preference. The purpose of this research is to conduct selection of performance promotion based on performance using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) selection methods such as Analytic Hiererachy Process (AHP), VIKOR, ELECTRE, and Promethee, in addition to proving the result of a number of methods based on MCDM such as AHP for the determination of preferences data design, while for data analysis using three methods that will be compared the results of VIKOR, ELECTREE and Promethee. The measurable performance bases for promotional positions are viewed from seven criteria described in the modeling hierarchy using the concept of analytic hierararchy process in the discussion of this paper. The results obtained provide an interpretation that the promethee method is closer to the actual results, while the vikor method is almost close to the results of truth and far away when compared with the electre method. Thus, it can be concluded that the best method for placing employee positions is promethee method.
PROSIDING : Comparison of Job Position Based Promotion Using : VIKOR,ELECTRE dan Promethee Method
LEMBAR HASIL PEER REVIEW - ADJAT SUDRADJAT - PROSIDING : Comparison of Job Position Based Promotion Using : VIKOR,ELECTRE dan Promethee Method
B. Prabowo,
"Motivasi Kerja Dan Prestasi Kerja (Studi Pada Karyawan PT Telkom
Indonesia Witel Jatim Selatan Malang)", J. Adm. Bisnis, vol.
32, no. 1, pp. 106-113, 2016.
I. Eva Solita
Pasaribu, "Sitem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan Karyawan Dengan
Metode Analytycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) Studi Kasus Pada PT. Selular Global
Net Medan" in Teknol. Dan Sisto Inf., AHP, pp. 71-78, 2015.
B. S. Riza, J.
Irianti, "Sistem Promosi Jabatan Dengan Menggunakan Analytic Network
Process (Studi Kasus di PT. Maxi Media)" in Konf. Nas. Sist. Inform., pp.
9-10, 2015.
M. F. El-santawy,
"A VIKOR Method for Solving Personnel Training", Int. J.
Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 9-12, 2012.
T. Bakshi, A.
Sinharay, B. Sarkar, S. K. Sanyal, "MCDM based project selection by F-AHP
& VIKOR", SEMCCO, vol. 7076, no. PART 1, pp. 381-388,
2011.
E. D. Coulter, J.
Coakley, J. Sessions, "The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Tutorial for Use
in Prioritizing Forest Road Investments to Minimize Environmental
Effects", Int. J. For. Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 51-70, 2006.
Q. Yin, An
Analytical Hierarchy Process Model For The Evaluation Of College Experimental
Teaching Quality, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 59-65, 2013.
A. Mardani, E. K.
Zavadskas, K. Govindan, A. A. Senin, A. Jusoh, "VIKOR technique: A
systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and
applications", Sustain., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-38, 2016.
H. Jati, A
Webometrics, "Comparison of University Webometrics Ranking Using
Multicriteria Decision Analysis: TOPSIS and VIKOR Method", Word J.
Int. Linguist. Assoc., pp. 1663-1669, 2012.
Z. Zhang, C. Guo,
"A VIKOR-Based Approach to Group Decision Making With Uncertain Preference
Ordinals and Incomplete Weight Information", Informatica, vol.
27, no. 3, pp. 689-708, 2016.
C. T. Sasanka, K.
Ravindra, "Implementation of VIKOR Method for Selection of Magnesium Alloy
to Suit Automotive Applications", Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol.,
vol. 83, pp. 49-58, 2015.
A. Basriani, Martina,
"Pengaruh Promosi Jabatan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Tasma Puja Di
Pekanbaru", Menara Ilmu, vol. XI, no. 76, pp. 15-28, 2017.
Saefudin, W.,
"Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan
Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada RSUD Serang", J.
Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33-37, 2013.
C. A. Poveda, M. G.
Lipsett, "Weighting sustainable development indicators (SDIs) for surface
mining operations using the analytical hierarchy process (ARP)", Int.
J. Anal. Hierarchy Process, vol. 5, no. 2, 2013.
J. M. Fernandes, S. P.
Rodrigues, L. A. Costa, "Comparing AHP and ELECTRE i for prioritizing
software requirements" in IEEE, 2015.
Akmaludin, Multicriteria
Analysis Menentukan Point Weight Comparison Dalam Penetapan Decision Priority,
vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11-19, 2015.
A. Ishizaka, A.
Labib, Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy
process, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 14336-14345, 2011.
T. L. Saaty,
"Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process", Int.
J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83, 2008.
T. L. Saaty,
"Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why
pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of
intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process", Rev.
la Real Acad. Ciencias Exactas Fis. y Nat.-Ser. A Mat., vol. 102, no. 2,
pp. 251-318, 2008.
S. Chupiphon, P.
Janjira, "Compariosn Of MCDM Methods For Intercrop Selection In Rubber
Plantations Chutiphon", J. ICT, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 165-182,
2016.
K. Renganath,
"Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy MCDM Techniques: A Literature Review"
in IEEE, 2016.
L. Markovic, M.
Cvetkovic, L. Milic-Markovic, "Multi-criteria decision-making when
choosing variant solution of highway route at the level of preliminary
design", Facta Univ.-Ser. Archit. Civ. Eng., vol. 11, no. 1,
pp. 71-87, 2013.
Y.-P. Ou Yang, H.-M.
Shieh, J.-D. Leu, G.-H. Tzeng, "a Vikor-Based Multiple Criteria Decision
Method for Improving Information Security Risk", Int. J. Inf.
Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 267, 2009.
K. Dashore, S. Singh
Pawar, N. Sohani, D. S. Verma, "Product Evaluation Using Entropy and Multi
Criteria Decision Making Methods", Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol.,
vol. 4, pp. 2183-2187, May 2013.
S. K. Jarial, R. K.
Garg, "Mcdm-Matrix Method-a Case Study for Commercial Vehicles in an
Automobile Industry", MNK Publ., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 337-341,
2012.
A. Sciences,
"Investment Destination Decision by Using the VIKOR Method in the
European", Am. Int. J. Contemp. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp.
16-24, 2016.
K. G. D. Prasad, M. V
Prasad, R. S. Kumar, V. S. D. Prasad, K. V. S. J. Shanmukhi, "Kano-based
VIKOR Decision model for Supplier Selection-A Case Study", Int. J.
Mech. Eng., no. 2014, pp. 227-231, 2017.
O. Yildirim, BF,
Emrah, "Evaluating Potential Freight Villages in Istanbul Using Multi
Criteria Decision Making Techniques", J. Logist. Manag., vol.
3, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2014.
TL Saaty, "How to
Make a Decision The AHP", Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 1, no. 48,
pp. 9-28, 1990.