Comparison Topsis And Saw Method In The Selection Of Tourism Destination In Indonesia

Comparison Topsis And Saw Method In The Selection Of Tourism Destination In Indonesia

• By Sunarti,; Sundari, Jenie; Anggraeni, Sita; Siahaan, Fernando B; Jimmi,;
• Seminar Internasional Bereputasi
• 124
• 1-6

 Based on data from the Central Bureau of Statistics of Indonesia there are 6 million more attractions there are in Indonesia, resulting in both local and foreign visitors to the difficulty in determining the options for visiting tourist attractions. To help travelers in facilitates are looking for sights required a decision support system in the selection of the right attractions, safe, cheap and convenient. Decision Support Systems is required to function as a tool for travelers in the decisionmaking process on the selection of tourist attractions. In this study, the authors compare Topsis and Saw method, in determining where that method showed results of the ranking order is not always the same, because there is a different algorithm on both of these methods and the difference in the scale of values of the weighting. The purpose of this method helps determine and increase local and foreign tourist visits to various attractions are there in Indonesia with the determination of the criteria for decision making give judgment on any alternative and weighting each criterion. Research results, based on the method of Saw, the code (A3) with a value of 0.98 with Toba Lake tourism object is set as the primary choice insights in Indonesia and based on Topsis method is addressed by alternative A11 on behalf of Raja Ampat Papua established as the first option with a value of 0.62. 

• Katakunci Saw, Topsis, Tourism Destination
• URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8780550
• Penerbit ,

REFERENSI

 [1] R. R. Tantowi, Akhmad, Andriyatna Rubenta, Neraca satelit Pariwisata Nasional 2017. Jakarta Pusat: Kementrian Pariwisata Deputi Bidang Pengembangan Kelembagaan Kepariwistaan, 2017. [2] N. Putu and E. Mahadewi, “Cooking Class Sebagai Paket Wisata,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2015. [3] M. Dȩbski and W. Nasierowski, “Criteria for the Selection of Tourism Destinations by Students from Different Countries,” Foundation of Management, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 317–330, 2017. [4] R. P, Noviana Eka. Sihwi, Sari Widya. Anggraningsih, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Lokasi Usaha Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw),” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2014. [5] Sari,Nurlita sari, Rukun Santoso dan Hasbi Yasin,  “Komputasi metode saw dan topsis menggunakan gui matlab untuk pemilihan jenis objek wisata terbaik,” vol. 5, pp. 289–298, 2016. [6] Putri, Rima Ermita, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lokasi Mendirikan Usaha Kuliner di Kota Nganjuk Menggunakan Metode Topsis Berbasis Webgis” no. 1, pp.123-128,2016. [7] M. A. Mude, “Perbandingan Metode Saw dan Topsis Pada Kasus UMKM,” J.urnal Ilmiah Ilkom., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2016. [8] N. Gupta and Y. Singh, “Optimal selection of wind power plant components using technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (Topsis),” Int. Conf. Electr. Power Energy Syst. ICEPES 2016, no. 2, pp. 310–315, 2017. [9] Sunarti, “Analisa Penilaian Kualitas Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Studi Kasus : Apartemen Plaza Senayan Jakarta ),” Journal of information system, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 100–111, 2017. [10] Irvanizam, “Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Simple Additive Weighting Approach for Selecting the Scholarship Recipients at Syiah Kuala University,” ICELTICs, pp. 245–250, 2017. [11] Ikhmah and Anik sri widawati,“Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Tempat Wisata,”pp. 91–96, 2018. 

[12] R. Ardhi and I. P. Endahuluan, “Komparasi Metode Saw dan Topsis untuk menentukan prioritas perbaikan jalan,”Jurnal Teknik Elektro,Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 8–11, 2016. [13] Goksu, Ali and Seniye Erdinc Kaya,“Ranking Of Tourist Destinations With Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods In Bosnia And Herzegovina,” Journal of economics and Business, Vol.XII, issue 2, pp.91103,2014. [14] N.Satrio,“Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lokasi Objek Wisata Di Kabupaten Grobogan Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching,” Skripsi, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, 2013. [15] D.Nofriansyah, Konsep Data Mining Vs Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015. [16] Sugiyono, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta, 2016.