The Third of ICIC 2018 Comparison of Job Position Based Promotion Using: VIKOR, ELECTRE And Promethee Method

Lihat/Buka File Repository

Lihat/Buka File Peer Review

Tanggal

2019-08-02

Abstraksi

The long-term prospect of the company's progress is determined by the quality of human resources (HR), The urgency to maintain the company's survival it takes a reliable and futuristic leader. Measuring tool that can be used is none other than the performance of human resources. Of course with potential leaders will provide the vision of the company's mission to grow and expand. Leadership selection process can be done with promotion positions based on performance preference. The purpose of this research is to conduct selection of performance promotion based on performance using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) selection methods such as Analytic Hiererachy Process (AHP), VIKOR, ELECTRE, and Promethee, in addition to proving the result of a number of methods based on MCDM such as AHP for the determination of preferences data design, while for data analysis using three methods that will be compared the results of VIKOR, ELECTREE and Promethee. The measurable performance bases for promotional positions are viewed from Intelegency (IG), Planning (PL), Depandebility (DP), Reaction Behavior (RB), Failed Jobs (FJ), Quantity of Work (QW), and Knowledge of Job (KJ). The results obtained provide an interpretation that the promethee method is closer to the actual results, while the vikor method is almost close to the results of truth and far away when compared with the electre method. Thus, it can be concluded that the best method for placing employee positions is promethee method.


Kata Kunci: Multi-criteria, Preferences of Job Performance, Elimination Method, ELECTRE, VIKOR, Promethee

URI
https://zenodo.org/record/3361529#.XUo60W5FzIU

Bidang ilmu
Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence)

Bibliografi

[1]     B. Prabowo, “Motivasi Kerja Dan Prestasi Kerja ( Studi Pada Karyawan PT Telkom Indonesia Witel Jatim Selatan Malang ),” J. Adm. Bisnis, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 106–113, 2016.

[2]     I. Eva Solita Pasaribu, “Sitem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan Karyawan Dengan Metode Analytycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) Studi Kasus Pada PT.Selular Global Net Medan,” Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf., no. AHP, pp. 71–78, 2015.

[3]     B. S. Riza and J. Irianti, “Sistem Promosi Jabatan Dengan Menggunakan Analytic Network Process ( Studi Kasus di PT . Maxi Media ),” Konf. Nas. Sist. Inform., pp. 9–10, 2015.

[4]     M. F. El-santawy, “A VIKOR Method for Solving Personnel Training,” Int. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 9–12, 2012.

[5]     T. Bakshi, A. Sinharay, B. Sarkar, and S. K. Sanyal, “MCDM based project selection by F-AHP & VIKOR,” SEMCCO, vol. 7076 LNCS, no. PART 1, pp. 381–388, 2011.

[6]     E. D. Coulter, J. Coakley, and J. Sessions, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Tutorial for Use in Prioritizing Forest Road Investments to Minimize Environmental Effects,” Int. J. For. Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 51–70, 2006.

[7]     Q. Yin, “An Analytical Hierarchy Process Model For The Evaluation Of College Experimental Teaching Quality,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 59–65, 2013.

[8]     A. Mardani, E. K. Zavadskas, K. Govindan, A. A. Senin, and A. Jusoh, “VIKOR technique: A systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications,” Sustain., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 2016.

[9]     H. Jati and  a Webometrics, “Comparison of University Webometrics Ranking Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis : TOPSIS and VIKOR Method,” Word J. Int. Linguist. Assoc., pp. 1663–1669, 2012.

[10]   Z. Zhang and C. Guo, “A VIKOR-Based Approach to Group Decision Making With Uncertain Preference Ordinals and Incomplete Weight Information,” Informatica, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 689–708, 2016.

[11]   C. T. Sasanka and K. Ravindra, “Implementation of VIKOR Method for Selection of Magnesium Alloy to Suit Automotive Applications,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 83, pp. 49–58, 2015.

[12]   A. Basriani and Martina, “Pengaruh Promosi Jabatan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Tasma Puja Di Pekanbaru,” Menara Ilmu, vol. XI, no. 76, pp. 15–28, 2017.

[13]   Saefudin and W. Sri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada RSUD Serang,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–37, 2013.

[14]   C. A. Poveda and M. G. Lipsett, “Weighting sustainable development indicators (SDIs) for surface mining operations using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP),” Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process, vol. 5, no. 2, 2013.

[15]   J. M. Fernandes, S. P. Rodrigues, and L. A. Costa, “Comparing AHP and ELECTRE i for prioritizing software requirements,” IEEE, 2015.

[16]   Akmaludin, “Multicriteria Analysis Menentukan Point Weight Comparison Dalam Penetapan Decision Priority,” vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2015.

[17]   A. Ishizaka and A. Labib, “Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process,” vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 14336–14345, 2011.

[18]   T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 83, 2008.

[19]   T. L. Saaty, “Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process,” Rev. la Real Acad. Ciencias Exactas, Fis. y Nat. - Ser. A Mat., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 251–318, 2008.

[20]   S. Chupiphon and P. Janjira, “Compariosn Of MCDM Methods For Intercrop Selection In Rubber Plantations Chutiphon,” J. ICT, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 165–182, 2016.

[21]   K. Renganath, “Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy MCDM Techniques : A Literature Review,” IEEE, 2016.

[22]   L. Markovic, M. Cvetkovic, and L. Milic-Markovic, “Multi-criteria decision-making when choosing variant solution of highway route at the level of preliminary design,” Facta Univ. - Ser. Archit. Civ. Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 2013.

[23]   Y.-P. Ou Yang, H.-M. Shieh, J.-D. Leu, and G.-H. Tzeng, “a Vikor-Based Multiple Criteria Decision Method for Improving Information Security Risk,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 267, 2009.

[24]   K. Dashore, S. Singh Pawar, N. Sohani, and D. S. Verma, “Product Evaluation Using Entropy and Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol., vol. 4, no. May, pp. 2183–2187, 2013.

[25]   S. K. Jarial and R. K. Garg, “Mcdm-Matrix Method-a Case Study for Commercial Vehicles in an Automobile Industry,” MNK Publ., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 337–341, 2012.

[26]   A. Sciences, “Investment Destination Decision by Using the VIKOR Method in the European,” Am. Int. J. Contemp. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 16–24, 2016.

[27]   K. G. D. Prasad, M. V Prasad, R. S. Kumar, V. S. D. Prasad, and K. V. S. J. Shanmukhi, “Kano-based VIKOR Decision model for Supplier Selection – A Case Study,” Int. J. Mech. Eng., no. 2014, pp. 227–231, 2017.

[28]   Ö. Yildirim, BF and Emrah, “Evaluating Potential Freight Villages in Istanbul Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques,” J. Logist. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014.

[29]   Saaty TL, “How to Make a Decision The AHP,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 1, no. 48, pp. 9–28, 1990.