INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE USING COBIT 4.0 DOMAIN DELIVERY SUPPORT AND MONITORING EVALUATION

research
  • 24 Oct
  • 2018

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE USING COBIT 4.0 DOMAIN DELIVERY SUPPORT AND MONITORING EVALUATION

Information Technology (IT) has rounded into a technology which hardly assist even determine level of performance a company. For the agenda of increasing performance, Bina Sarana Informatika (BSI) has been supported by information technology. Constructively IT (Information Technology), Business process
or job activity process happened in university can be put across and efficient. But other side, the purpose of business, applying of IT needs cost money high investment at risk to big enough failure. Therefore required a mechanism Arrange IT Management (IT Governance) which totally and structural from starting planning
untill the observation. This research is to give a model proposal arrange IT Management for Bina Sarana Informatika (BSI) by relating COBIT (Control Objective for Information and Related Technology) Version of 4.0. This research is focused on two main domain COBIT, that is Delivery Support (DS) and Monitoring Evaluation (ME) and this research is continuation from other researcher that is Evi, Rahmawati, the
researcher who focuses on domain DS and ME. Methodologies are done through analysis whereas from vision identification, mission and purpose of organization and also mission and vision from part of Biro Teknologi Informasi (BTI). Here in after identifying by management awareness to IT asset function which have him (it in supporting the of reaching company mission and vision through questioner. From both the data hence is determinable of maturity goals (expected maturity level) appropriate for Bina Sarana Informatika (BSI). Then continued by doing assessment of current maturity level through questioner and interview to related and relevant responder of management of titanium. The expected data and current
maturity levels of each IT process are analyzed to look at the gap, and then determined gradually; Steps that must be taken to overcome the gap.

Unduhan

 

REFERENSI

[1] Guldentops, Eric. “Maturity Measurement-First the purpose then the methods”, USA,
(2003).
[2] IT Governance Institute. “Management Guidelines & Audit Guidelines, Control
Objectives”, COBIT 3rd ed. USA:ICASA, (2000).
[3] IT Governance Institute. “IT Governance implementation guide”.(2003).
[4] IT Governance Institute. Board Brifieng on IT Governance, 2nd Edition, IT Governance Instiutute.(2003).
[5] IT Governance Institute. COBIT 4.0 : Control Objectives, Management Guidelines, Maturity Models, IT Governance Institute.(2005).
[6] IT Governance Institute and the Office of Commerce. Aligning COBIT, ITIL and ISO
17799 for Business Benefit, IT GovernanceInstitute and the Office of Government
Commerce.(2005).
[7] Pederiva, A. The COBIT Maturity Model in a Vendor Evaluation Case, Information System Control Journal Volume 3, 2003, Information System Audit and Control Association.(2003).
[8] Reingold, S. Refining IT Processes Using COBIT, Information System Control Journal Volume 3, 2003, Information System Audit and Control Association.(2005).
[9] Sekaran, Uma. ”Research Methods for Business, a skill-building approach”, 3th ed.,
John Wiley & Sons Inc.2000.
[10] The COBIT Steering Commite and the IT Governance Institute. COBIT (3rd Edition)
Implementarion Tools Set, IT Governance Institute.2000.
[11] Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., Guldentops, E. Structures, Processes and
Relational Mechanism for IT Governance, dalam Strategis for Information Technology
Governance, Van Grembergen, W, Editor Idea Group Inc.2004.
[12] Weber, Ron. Information System Control and Audit. Prentice Hall.1998.